LSE IDEAS is a centre for the study of international affairs, diplomacy and grand strategy at the London School of Economics. This blog features articles, resources, reviews and opinion pieces from academics associated with LSE IDEAS.
Monday, 17 January 2011
Saleh's Opportunism Renders US Counterterrorism Efforts Ineffective
By Nima Khorrami
Yemen, the poorest country in the Middle East, faces a number of fundamental social, political and economic challenges. Oil revenue currently represents 70% of the state budget and supports Yemen’s patronage system. However, reserves are estimated to run out within the next ten years. Water resources are diminishing rapidly and a water crisis is imminent. At the same time, tension and open conflict with the Houthis in the North, secessionist groups in the South, and al-Qaeda elements in Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) pose serious challenges to the legitimacy of the government in Sana’a.
The overall security situation in Yemen is such that doubts are being raised about whether parliamentary elections, planned for 27 April 2011, can be held in a relatively free and fair manner. This is due to the fact that President has been benefiting from the current composition of the Parliament heavily dominated by members of his party – General People's Congress – and political allies. Parliament's recent approval of constitutional amendments which could see President Saleh rule for life – set to be submitted for a referendum on the same day as Parliamentary elections –illustrates why the upcoming elections are likely to be rigged.
Throughout his 32 years of rule, President Saleh – a military general by profession – has managed to concentrate all powers in the Office of the President. As a consequence, the Cabinet, Parliament and other state institutions have, to a large degree, been marginalised from relevant decision-making processes. He has established an inclusive patronage structure binding tribes, opposition politicians, businessmen and religious figures into a web of personal loyalty through the distribution of oil rents. This formula has ensured Saleh's survival but it has distorted party politics and stifled grassroots political participation.
However, the diminishing sources of state revenue in combination with an increased level of social unrest in north, south, and increasing presence of AQAP is gradually reducing his grip on power. Saleh has also become highly unpopular in certain segments of society, further exacerbating political conflict. Under his stewardship, the Yemeni economy has not grown sufficiently to employ its youth – an incredible 45% of the Yemen's population is under the age of 15 –, and thus ordinary Yemenis see him as the main cause of their socioeconomic miseries.
This is why the US government's top priority in Yemen – counterterrorism – is actually perceived as an opportunity by the Yemeni state to consolidate its power domestically. For Yemen’s long-serving president, AQAP is a third-order issue. In fact, to many in the leadership, al-Qaeda’s small number of followers in the country must seem far less a threat than an opportunity. An increased U.S. military commitment to Yemen pumps weapons and training into the country that can be employed against a wide range of threats that have nothing to do with al-Qaeda. A flood of money creates opportunities not only for contracting, but for graft, corruption and extortion.
Yemen is a multifaceted country with diverse ethnicities, cultures, and religious affiliations. This diversity has always been perceived as a threat due to the ruling elite’s preference for forced unity. Rather than embracing the 'others' and integrating them through an acceptable social programme, the state-sponsored policy dictates to be either the same as 'us' or risk abolishment. This, in essence, constitutes the root causes of the conflict with Al-Houthis in North as well as the Southern separatist movements since both camps complain about regional underdevelopment and perceived socioeconomic injustices.
It follows then that apart from counterterrorism and/or deradicalisation efforts, international community should pursue two other primary goals in the Yemeni theatre.
First, external actors urgently need to address socio-economic problems in Yemen by devising a mechanism to both tackle governmental corruption and also facilitate much needed political reforms and dialogue on the future of Yemen with the Yemeni government, leaders of the Houthi rebellion and the Southern secessionist movements. Nevertheless, it ought to be acknowledged that the increasing presence of AQAP and the subsequent formation of formal and informal ties between its elements and some tribes have greatly complicated the situation. The good news, however, is that tribal protections that have been extended by some tribes – i.e. Al-Herak – to AQAP elements are based on political calculations rather than ideological affiliation.
Secondly, extra-regional actors need to understand the motivations and strategies of GCC states, in particular Saudi Arabia, towards Yemen and, by extension, seek to encourage their proactive engagement in ensuring the stability of the country. Yet again, there is no agreement on the nature and extent of GCC states involvement in Yemeni affairs due to the complexity of geopolitical factors. It is not easy to persuade six Sheikhdoms to support and empower a Republic as this could have domestic repercussions for the Gulf States, especially in Saudi Arabia and the Kingdom of Bahrain.
Nima Khorrami is a security analyst with the Transnational Crisis Project
Shifting Sands is the blog of the Middle East International Affairs Programme at LSE IDEAS, analysing current events in the Middle East and contributing to the ongoing deliberations over policy prescriptions.